AccScience Publishing / STI / Volume 46 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.36922/sti.0240
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Minimum Incision Size Required for Implantation: A Comparison of Medtronic InterStim X™ and Axonics F15® Pulse Generator Dimensions

Ali Azadi1,2* Annie Phan3 Arun Kathuria3 Polina Sawyer2 Greg Marchand4
Show Less
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and East Valley Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
3 Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, United States of America
4 Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, Arizona, United States of America
STI 2026, 46(1), 11–15; https://doi.org/10.36922/sti.0240
Received: 7 August 2025 | Revised: 16 November 2025 | Accepted: 18 November 2025 | Published online: 15 January 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a guideline-recommended therapy for a variety of bladder and bowel dysfunctions. This study compares the physical dimensions of two SNM implantable pulse generators—Medtronic's InterStim X and Axonics's F15—and examines the potential clinical implications.

Methods: We extracted height, length, thickness, and weight data from manufacturer specifications and interpreted these in the context of the SNM surgical technique.

Results: Our analysis showed that the devices are similar in overall size (InterStim X: 44 × 51 × 8 mm, 22 g, ~12.5 cc; Axonics F15: 39 × 53 × 6.7 mm, 24.5 g, ~10 cc). Despite these similarities, other metrics can affect the minimum incision size required for implantation.

Conclusion: Overall, the two devices have comparable dimensions; however, InterStim X requires a smaller incision size for implantation than the Axonics F15.

Keywords
Axonics F15
Device dimensions
Implantable pulse generator
InterStim X
Minimum incision size required for implantation
Sacral neuromodulation
Surgical technique
References
  1. Noblett KL, Crowder C. Sacral neuromodulation. In: Ostergard's Textbook of Urogynecology: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2022:262-277
  2. DeGroat WC, Saum WR. Synaptic transmission in parasympathetic ganglia in the urinary bladder of the cat. J Physiol. 1976;256(1):137-158. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011316
  3. Blok BF, Groen J, Bosch JL, Veltman DJ, Lammertsma AA. Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in patients with urge incontinence and implanted neurostimulators. BJU Int. 2006;98(6):1238-1243. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06521.x
  4. Zhang F, Zhao S, Shen B, et al. Neural pathways involved in sacral neuromodulation of reflex bladder activity in cats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;304(6):F710-F717. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00334.2012
  5. Hassouna MM, Siegel SW, Anyehoult AA, et al. Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1849-1854. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67558-1
  6. Spilotros M, Gerbasi S, Lasorsa F, et al. Sacral neuromodulation: device improvement and current applications in urology. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(3):509. doi:10.3390/medicina60030509
  7. Medtronic, Inc. InterStim X Model 97800 Neurostimulator: Implant Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Medtronic, Inc.; 2021. https://manuals.medtronic.com/manuals/main/en_US/manual/therapy?therapy=SNM+for+Urinary+Control. Accessed June 20, 2025.
  8. Axonics, Inc. Axonics F-15 Recharge-Free Neurostimulator, Model 4101: Implant Manual. Irvine, CA: Axonics, Inc.; 2023. https://www.axonics.com/images/files/06-26-2024/110-0230-201rC_Axonics_F15_Neurostimulator_Implant_Manual_Canada_English.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2025.
  9. Carbone L, Rothenberger R, Houston HE, et al. Infection-reducing strategies in sacral neuromodulation: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025;44(4):839-850. doi:10.1002/nau.70023
Share
Back to top
Surgical Technology International, Electronic ISSN: 1090-3941 Published by AccScience Publishing