Surgical Technology International / STI / Volume 44 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1758
Cite this article
32
Download
55
Citations
215
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

True Confessions of Neutral Mechanical Disciple-How I Learned to Love a Patient-Specific Target

Nathalie Willems1 Kevin B Marchand2 Christina Esposito1 Daniele De Massari1 Daniel Hameed3 Gavin Clark4 Robert Marchand5 Michael A Mont3 Michael Dunbar6
Show Less
1 Stryker Corporation, Mahwah, New Jersey.
2 Northwell Health Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York.
3 LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
4 University of Western Australia, Medical School, Crawley, Australia.
5 Orthopedics Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island.
6 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax
STI 2024 , 44(1), 285–293; https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1758
Published: 15 July 2024
© 2024 by the Surgical Technology International ™. Licensee Surgical Technology International, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction: Classical neutral mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been a standard paradigm, while more recently, other alignment schemas, such as kinematic, individualized, and functional, have been explored. This study aimed to investigate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based surgical robotics inputs on a classically trained surgeon's TKA component positions and alignment targets over time.

Materials and methods: Data from 1,394 consecutive robotically-assisted TKAs by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. Metrics collected included pre-balance planned implant component positions, final planned implant component positions after soft tissue balancing, and constitutional alignment from CT scans. Joint line obliquity was plotted against the arithmetic hip-knee angle (aHKA) using coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Three categories of alignment strategy were defined: true mechanical alignment (tMA), adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), and no mechanical alignment (noMA).

Results: A shift to overall varus component positioning was observed over the years. Joint line obliquity according to CPAK showed a wider spread in later years, and the distribution of tibial and femoral coronal alignment angles expanded over time.

Conclusion: The study revealed a change in alignment targets and final positioning of components away from neutral biomechanical axes in a large volume of TKAs by a single, classically trained surgeon over five years of using a robotic arm-assisted TKA system with CT-based planning. The most dominant factor for this change was the use of 3D CT planning, allowing the surgeon to assess patient-specific anatomy and plan accordingly. Outcome data is needed to determine if this change in behavior and surgical technique was beneficial. In summary, using a CT scan-based robotically assisted technique led to a gradual and complete shift from tMA to predominantly a non-mechanically aligned philosophy in TKA.

Share
Back to top
Surgical Technology International, Electronic ISSN: 1090-3941 Published by Surgical Technology International