Abstract


In western countries, approximately 1 % of individuals are affected by chronic wounds during their lifetime. Due to changing demographics, this incidence will likely increase in the future. Additionally, the high prevalence is accompanied by substantial treatment expenditures. Therefore, it is of global interest to find effective treatment algorithms.
In this article, we present up-to-date solutions for treating chronic / difficult to heal and complex wounds by means of plastic and reconstructive surgery. We outline the principles of chronic wounds and how to perform an appropriate diagnosis. Close cooperation and interdisciplinary exchange are important for optimizing treatment. We report the principles of wound debridement and the role of negative pressure wound therapy. Moreover, we discuss the state of the art of defect reconstruction by means of skin grafting, with or without acellular dermal matrices, local tissue transfers and free tissue transfers. In very complex cases, the local macrovascular blood flow is greatly reduced and there are few, if any, recipient vessels for free flap reconstruction. We discuss the role of arteriovenous loops to overcome this problem.

Abstract


Autologous keratinocyte culture, and combinations of scaffolds, different cell types, solutions of macromolecules, or growth factors have contributed to the resurfacing of full-thickness skin defects. Ideally, a treatment for full-thickness skin defects should not merely reestablish continuity of the surface of the skin but should restore its structure to allow skin to function as a dynamic biological factory that can participate in protein synthesis, metabolism, and cell signaling, and form an essential part of the body’s immune, nervous, and endocrine systems. This paper provides a review of clinically available autologous skin replacements, highlighting the importance of regenerating an organ that will function physiologically.

Abstract


Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) are often used as noninvasive adjuncts in patients with lymphedema, and more recently with venous stasis disease, to promote flow and reduce the adverse effects of interstitial edema associated with both disorders. We will be focusing on lower extremity wounds associated with venous and/or lymphatic disease, the combination often referred to as “lymphophlebitic” disease, and the treatment effect of IPC on this disease process and its sequelae.
The function and purpose of pneumatic compression is closely examined along with a variety of pneumatic compression devices that currently exist in the market. A thorough review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the utility of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of lower extremity venous stasis ulcers. Additionally, the author describes personal experience with the use of pneumatic compression on 10 patients with venous stasis ulcers at a single center. There is significant data supporting the use of IPC in patients with lymphophlebitic disease. Overall, ideal patient selection may be crucial. Previous data has shown that patients with high body mass index (>33 kg/m2) and poor functional status (walking less than 200m a day) are related to poor ulcer healing. Therefore, a study that looks primarily at this group (as our small quality assurance [QA] project did) may show increased benefit in this population.
It is clear that IPC is of benefit to some patient cohorts with lymphophlebitic disease. This advanced therapy would help patients who have failure of their calf muscle pump and an inability to improve it through other means. However, it is only part of an algorithm that includes: direct wound bed management, moisture control, possible primary venous disease intervention, physical therapy, weight loss, and improved nutrition.

Abstract


Wound care is a multidisciplinary field with significant economic burden to our healthcare system. Not only does wound care cost the US healthcare system $20 billion annually, but wounds also remarkably impact the quality of life of patients; wounds pose significant risk of mortality, as the five-year mortality rate for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and ischemic ulcers is notably higher compared to commonly encountered cancers such as breast and prostate. Although it is important to measure how wounds may or may not be improving over time, the only relative “marker” for this is wound area measurement—area measurements can help providers determine if a wound is on a healing or non-healing trajectory. Because wound area measurements are currently the only readily available “gold standard” for predicting healing outcomes, there is a pressing need to understand how other relative biomarkers may play a role in wound healing. Currently, wound care centers across the nation employ various techniques to obtain wound area measurements; length and width of a wound can be measured with a ruler, but this carries a high amount of inter- and intrapersonal error as well as uncertainty. Acetate tracings could be used to limit the amount of error but do not account for depth, thereby making them inaccurate. Here, we discuss current imaging modalities and how they can serve to accurately measure wound size and serve as useful adjuncts in wound assessment. Moreover, new imaging modalities are also discussed and how up-and-coming technologies can provide important information on “biomarkers” for wound healing.