Abstract


Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication of ostomy formation with an incidence of up to 56% depending on the type and location of the ostomy as well as the length of follow-up. This review seeks to provide concise insight into the current state of parastomal hernia repair using a hernia mesh, with a particular focus on biologic mesh. Surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of the “keyhole”, modified Sugarbaker, and sandwich procedures are described. The current body of evidence on prophylactic biologic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia is discussed. Current evidence (while not high-quality) supports the hypothesis that prophylactic biologic mesh placement may decrease parastomal hernia rates. Further experimental and observational clinical studies are required to better understand the role of prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing colorectal resection with permanent ostomy.

Abstract


Introduction: As studies continue to provide advanced knowledge concerning abdominal wall closure after laparotomy, there have been many improvements in surgical techniques and recommended closure materials. However, there continues to be a high rate of incisional hernias following exploratory laparotomies. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of available educational models for laparotomy closure.
Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature review was made using PubMed, Cochrane, and NCBI MeSH databases to find the most relevant articles associated with various abdominal closure models using specific keywords.
Results: Human cadaver, animal, synthetic, and virtual reality models were reviewed. Strengths and limitations of each model were described.
Conclusion: Each model has practical benefits in its ability to mimic in vitro anatomy and the experiential similarities to actual laparotomy closure. However, there are also limitations and potential cost-prohibitive factors for individual models. Overall, while there have been some advances in synthetic and virtual models, human cadaver and porcine models remain the most similar to human abdominal wall closures.

Abstract


Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) involves instilling 2.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate into the abdomen in an attempt to both resuscitate the patient and decrease systemic inflammation; 800cc are instilled in the first hour and 400cc/h are instilled each subsequent hour. DPR has been shown to decrease systemic inflammation, increase the rate of primary abdominal closure, lower the rate of intra-abdominal infections, and lower the rate of complications. It also increases blood flow to the intestines, helping to prevent ischemia and re-perfusion injury. We present the technique used for DPR in a patient with an intra-abdominal catastrophe, as well as the use of Kerecis® Omega3 Wound graft (Kerecis, Arlington, VA) and wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for creation of a floating stoma.

Abstract


Background: Epigastric hernias may lead to discomfort and pain. The mainstay of treatment is surgical repair with mesh reinforcement. The primary aim of this study was to compare the recurrence rates of laparoscopic epigastric hernia repair (LEHR) and conventional open epigastric hernia repair (OEHR) with mesh reinforcement. Secondary aims were to evaluate perioperative outcomes and quality of life.
Methods: Ninety-nine patients (58% female) from two non-academic hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The Short-Form 36 Health Survey questionnaire and Carolina Comfort Scale were used to assess quality of life and complaints related to mesh implantation.
Results: Forty-two (42%) patients underwent LEHR and 57 (58%) underwent OEHR. The mean follow-up at the outpatient clinic was 7.1 months in the LEHR group and 8.1 months in the OEHR group. The mean follow-up by telephone contact was 67.8 months in the OEHR group and 58.1 months in the LEHR group. The risk of recurrence appeared to be slightly lower for LEHR (2%) compared to OEHR (7%), but this difference was not significant (p=0.298). The median surgical duration was 54 minutes in the LEHR group and 28 minutes in the OEHR group (p<0.001). The median hospitalization time was 1 day in the LEHR group and 0.5 days in the OEHR group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair tended to be associated with a lower risk of recurrence, but this difference was not statistically significant. Although the surgical duration was longer for the LEHR group, the postoperative outcomes were similar between groups, making laparoscopic repair a feasible alternative to the open approach for epigastric hernias.