Abstract


Objectives: To compare the perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic pyelolithotomy (RP) and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) for the treatment of renal stones.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic pyelolithotomy from January 2015 to December 2018.
Results: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The mean operative time was 173 ± 51 and 182 ± 62 min in the RP and LP groups, respectively (p=0.6). Blood loss and length of hospital stay with the robotic approach were lower than those with the laparoscopic approach (210 ± 180 ml vs. 639 ± 412 ml, p<0.001, and 3.8 ± 3 days vs. 7.3 ± 2.8 days, p=0.001). A complete stone-free status was achieved in 17 (85%) patients in the RP group and 8 (42%) in the LP group (p=0.01). Post-operative complications with the two approaches were also similar.
Conclusions: In some selected cases, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy are alternative procedures for large, multiple and complex kidney stones. The robotic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss and fewer days of hospitalization compared to the laparoscopic method, and also gives a better stone-free rate.

Abstract


Aim: To compare surgical, functional and early survival outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction in patients age ≥ 75 y to those in patients age < 75 y using Propensity Score Matching.
Methods: We collected data from 15 patients age ≥ 75 y from among 60 consecutive RARC with ONB reconstruction performed at our institution from January 2015 to July 2018. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon after modular training under the supervision of a skilled surgeon. Demographic, surgical, functional and survival data were prospectively collected and compared to the corresponding data from 15 patients from the same series age < 75 y, matched according to the ASA score, body mass index, clinical stage and associated carcinoma in situ using Propensity Score Matching.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to preoperative parameters, such as ASA score, BMI and preoperative stage. The same homogeneity was found for intraoperative parameters, such as operation time, number of nodes retrieved and ONB time. The only statistically significant difference noted was in the percentage of nerve-sparing procedures, which was higher in the younger patient group (p < 0.001). The percentages of early and late postoperative complications were higher in the older patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, there were no differences among the two populations in terms of functional outcomes (daytime and nighttime continence, potency), or in either cancer-specific or overall mortality.
Conclusions: RARC with totally intracorporeal ONB diversion can be offered to older patients with an expectation of good surgical, functional and early survival outcomes, although further studies with a larger sample size will be needed to confirm these results.